Ch16 Weak Form ID Drill — Qal Imperfect Weak Verbs

BBH Chapter 16 · 50 forms

Instructions: For each form, identify: (a) Weak Class, (b) Person, (c) Number, (d) Gender, (e) Root.
Part A: forms are grouped by class with a diagnostic hint. Part B: mixed — identify the class first.

Part A — By Weak Class

Group 1: III-ה (Lamed-He)

Diagnostic: long form ends in -ֶה (Seghol + he); short Jussive drops the ה.
#FormWeak ClassPers.Num.Gen.Root
1יִבְנֶה
יִבְנֶהIII-ה3smבָּנָהSeghol-he ending; long form
2תַּעֲשֶׂה
תַּעֲשֶׂהIII-ה3/2sf/mעָשָׂהI-gutt. (ע) also; chateph prefix
3יִהְיֶה
יִהְיֶהIII-ה3smהָיָהMost common III-ה Imperfect
4תִּרְאֶה
תִּרְאֶהIII-ה3/2sf/mרָאָהIII-ה + I-gutt. (ר light); Seghol-he
5יִבֶּן
יִבֶּןIII-ה3smבָּנָהShort Jussive — ה dropped, vowel shortens to Seghol

Group 2: III-א (Lamed-Alef)

Diagnostic: form ends in silent א; preceding vowel is often Qamets.
#FormWeak ClassPers.Num.Gen.Root
6יִמְצָא
יִמְצָאIII-א3smמָצָאSilent aleph; preceding Qamets
7תִּקְרָא
תִּקְרָאIII-א3/2sf/mקָרָאSilent aleph; Qamets before א
8אֶמְצָא
אֶמְצָאIII-א1scמָצָא1cs prefix (aleph) + silent final aleph
9יִמְצְאוּ
יִמְצְאוּIII-א3pmמָצָא3mp -וּ suffix; aleph visible
10נִקְרָא
נִקְרָאIII-א1pcקָרָא1cp nun prefix; Qamets-aleph ending

Group 3: III-ח/ע (Lamed-Guttural)

Diagnostic: long 3ms/3fs ends in Pathach furtive before ח or ע; short/wayyiqtol: closed syllable, no furtive.
#FormWeak ClassPers.Num.Gen.Root
11יִשְׁלַחַ
יִשְׁלַחַIII-ח3smשָׁלַחPathach furtive before ח; long form
12תִּשְׁמַעַ
תִּשְׁמַעַIII-ע3/2sf/mשָׁמַעPathach furtive before ע; long form
13וַיִּשְׁמַע
וַיִּשְׁמַעIII-ע3smשָׁמַעWayyiqtol short form; no furtive; syllable closed
14יִשְׁלְחוּ
יִשְׁלְחוּIII-ח3pmשָׁלַח3mp; no furtive before suffix
15אֶשְׁמַע
אֶשְׁמַעIII-ע1scשָׁמַע1cs; B-class Pathach; guttural at R3 closes syllable

Group 4: I-Guttural (Pe-Guttural)

Diagnostic: Pathach under prefix consonant (not Hireq); chateph-Pathach under R1 guttural.
#FormWeak ClassPers.Num.Gen.Root
16יַעֲמֹד
יַעֲמֹדI-gutt.3smעָמַדPathach prefix; chateph-Pathach under ע
17תַּחֲלֹם
תַּחֲלֹםI-gutt.3/2sf/mחָלַםPathach prefix; chateph under ח
18יֹאמַר
יֹאמַרI-gutt. (א)3smאָמַרHolem prefix (special for aleph); must memorize
19תַּעַמְדוּ
תַּעַמְדוּI-gutt.2pmעָמַדPathach prefix; chateph resolves before suffix
20נַעֲמֹד
נַעֲמֹדI-gutt.1pcעָמַד1cp nun prefix + Pathach/chateph pattern

Group 5: I-נ (Pe-Nun)

Diagnostic: unexpected dagesh forte in R2 (nun assimilated); Tsere or Holem in root.
#FormWeak ClassPers.Num.Gen.Root
21יִתֵּן
יִתֵּןI-נ3smנָתַןNun assimilated → dagesh forte in ת; Tsere
22תִּתֵּן
תִּתֵּןI-נ3/2sf/mנָתַןSame assimilation pattern
23וַיִּתֵּן
וַיִּתֵּןI-נ3smנָתַןWayyiqtol; dagesh in ת still present
24יִפֹּל
יִפֹּלI-נ3smנָפַלNun assimilation → dagesh in פ; Holem
25תִּתְּנוּ
תִּתְּנוּI-נ2pmנָתַןDagesh in ת; reduced vowel before plural suffix

Group 6: I-י (Pe-Yod)

Diagnostic: Tsere under the prefix consonant instead of Hireq; R1 yod absent from the form.
#FormWeak ClassPers.Num.Gen.Root
26יֵדַע
יֵדַעI-י3smיָדַעTsere prefix (not Hireq); yod R1 absent
27תֵּשֵׁב
תֵּשֵׁבI-י3/2sf/mיָשַׁבTsere prefix; Tsere under R2 (Seghol class)
28וַיֵּלֶד
וַיֵּלֶדI-י3smיָלַדWayyiqtol; Tsere prefix + waw-consecutive
29יֵצֵא
יֵצֵאI-י3smיָצָאTsere prefix; III-א also in play (aleph at R3)
30אֵלֵד
אֵלֵדI-י1scיָלַד1cs; aleph prefix takes Tsere (not Seghol)

Group 7: Biconsonantal (II-י/ו)

Diagnostic: Qamets under prefix consonant; no R2 consonant visible; ו or י as middle element.
#FormWeak ClassPers.Num.Gen.Root
31יָקוּם
יָקוּםBiconsonantal3smקוּםQamets under prefix; Shureq as middle vowel
32תָּבוֹא
תָּבוֹאBiconsonantal3/2sf/mבּוֹאQamets prefix; Holem Waw as middle vowel
33וַיָּבֹא
וַיָּבֹאBiconsonantal3smבּוֹאWayyiqtol; Qamets under prefix
34יָמוּת
יָמוּתBiconsonantal3smמוּתQamets prefix; Shureq middle; stative sense
35וַיָּקׇם
וַיָּקׇםBiconsonantal3smקוּםWayyiqtol; short form — Qamets hatuf in root syllable

Group 8: Geminate (Ayin-Doubled)

Diagnostic: dagesh forte in R2 (= R3); or short contracted form with Qamets prefix. Root knowledge needed to distinguish from Biconsonantal.
#FormWeak ClassPers.Num.Gen.Root
36יָסֹב
יָסֹבGeminate3smסָבַבQamets prefix; Holem; R2=R3 (dagesh absorbed)
37יִסֹּב
יִסֹּבGeminate3smסָבַבHireq prefix + Holem + dagesh forte in ב (R2=R3)
38וַיָּסׇּב
וַיָּסׇּבGeminate3smסָבַבWayyiqtol; Qamets prefix + dagesh forte in root
39תָּסֹב
תָּסֹבGeminate3/2sf/mסָבַבQamets prefix; Holem; same as יָסֹב pattern
40יִסֹּבּוּ
יִסֹּבּוּGeminate3pmסָבַב3mp; dagesh forte in ב; -וּ suffix

Part B — Mixed Forms

Identify the weak class first, then parse the form completely.
#FormWeak ClassPers.Num.Gen.Root
41וַיָּקׇם
וַיָּקׇםBiconsonantal3smקוּםGen 22:3 — Abraham arising
42יִבְנֶה
יִבְנֶהIII-ה3smבָּנָהLong Imperfect; Seghol-he ending
43יִתֵּן
יִתֵּןI-נ3smנָתַןDagesh in ת from assimilated nun
44יַעֲשֶׂה
יַעֲשֶׂהIII-ה + I-gutt.3smעָשָׂהIII-ה + I-gutt. ע (chateph prefix)
45תֵּדַע
תֵּדַעI-י3/2sf/mיָדַעTsere prefix; I-י diagnostic
46וַיִּשְׁמַע
וַיִּשְׁמַעIII-ע3smשָׁמַעIII-guttural wayyiqtol (no furtive)
47יִמְצָא
יִמְצָאIII-א3smמָצָאSilent aleph; Qamets
48וַיָּבֹאוּ
וַיָּבֹאוּBiconsonantal3pmבּוֹאWayyiqtol 3mp; Qamets + -וּ
49תִּתֵּן
תִּתֵּןI-נ3/2sf/mנָתַןDagesh in ת; same assimilation pattern
50יֵצֵא
יֵצֵאI-י3smיָצָאTsere prefix; I-י (+ III-א at R3)

Discussion Questions
  1. Biconsonantal vs. Geminate: Both classes can show Qamets under the prefix consonant (יָסֹב / יָקוּם). What distinguishes them? What additional information do you need to tell them apart?
  2. I-נ in Perfect vs. Imperfect: Why is I-נ essentially invisible in the Perfect (Ch14) but produces a dramatic change in the Imperfect? What is happening phonologically?
  3. The III-ה Jussive: How does a III-ה Jussive form (e.g. יִבֶּן) differ from the long Imperfect (יִבְנֶה)? What changes, and why does this matter for reading narrative?
  4. I-י prefix pattern: Why does I-י show Tsere under the prefix consonant instead of Hireq? Trace what happens to the yod at R1 when the imperfect prefix is added.
  5. Wayyiqtol identification: What morphological feature is shared by all wayyiqtol forms across all weak classes? How does recognizing this feature help you identify a wayyiqtol even in an unfamiliar weak root?