Chapter 21 — Qal Infinitive Absolute Parsing Drill

For each form: (a) Identify as IA, IC, Imperative, Imperfect, or Perfect — and briefly explain how you know; (b) Root; (c) Root class; (d) Function (if IA: Emphatic / Imperatival / Manner / Progressive / Serial). Click ▶ Answer to reveal.

IA vs. IC diagnostic: Strong roots — IA has Qamets under R1 (שָׁמ֣וֹר); IC/Imper. have Shewa (שְׁמֹר). III-ה: IA ends in ה; IC ends in וֹת. I-י: IA retains yod-shape (הָל֣וֹךְ); IC is contracted (לֶ/כֶת). Biconsonantals: IA and IC are identical — context distinguishes.

Part A — Emphatic Pairs (IA + Finite Verb)

Both members of each pair are given. Identify the IA, name the root, root class, and function.

#Form PairWhich is IA?RootRoot ClassFunctionGloss
1מ֥וֹת — תָּמוּת
IA = מ֥וֹתמותBiconsonantalEmphatic"you shall surely die"; death-penalty formula; IA before Imperfect 2ms of same root
2אָכֹ֥ל — תֹּאכֵֽל
IA = אָכֹ֥לאכלI-alephEmphatic"you may freely eat" (Gen 2:16); Qamets under aleph; permission formula
3שָׁמ֣וֹעַ — תִּשְׁמָע
IA = שָׁמ֣וֹעַשמעStrong B (gutt. R3)Emphatic"hear attentively"; Qamets + Holem-waw + Pathach before ע
4שָׁמ֣וֹר — תִּשְׁמְרוּן
IA = שָׁמ֣וֹרשמרStrong AEmphatic"carefully keep"; Qamets R1 + Holem-waw R2
5רָאֹ֣ה — רָאִ֛יתִי
IA = רָאֹ֣הראהIII-הEmphatic"I have surely seen" (Exo 3:7); ה retained in IA; Qamets + Holem
6טָרֹ֥ף — טֹרַ֖ף
IA = טָרֹ֥ףטרףStrong AEmphatic"he has surely been torn" (Gen 44:28); IA + passive Perfect; Qamets + Holem
7נָת֤וֹן — יִנָּתֵן
IA = נָת֤וֹןנתןI-נEmphatic"it shall certainly be given"; both nuns retained (contrast IC: תֵּת)
8אָבֹ֖ד — תֹּאבֵדוּן
IA = אָבֹ֖דאבדStrong AEmphatic"you shall utterly perish"; Deuteronomy threat formula; Qamets + Holem

Part B — Standalone IA Forms

No paired finite verb given. Identify as IA, give root, root class, and function.

#FormIA or other?RootRoot ClassFunction
9זָכ֕וֹר
IAזכרStrong AImperatival — "Remember!" (Exo 20:8); Qamets + Holem-waw; IA functions as command
10שָׁמ֗וֹר
IAשמרStrong AImperatival — "Keep!" (Deu 5:12); same structure as זָכ֕וֹר
11הָל֣וֹךְ
IAהלךI-יManner/Progressive — "going"; paired with another IA to express ongoing motion; full yod-shape (contrast IC לֶכֶת)
12יָצוֹא֙
IAיצאI-י + III-אEmphatic/Manner — "going out"; I-י IA retains yod-shape (contrast IC: צֵאת)
13הָי֧וֹ
IAהיהIII-הEmphatic/Verbal noun — "being/surely be"; ה retained in IA (contrast IC: הֱיוֹת)
14גָּאֹ֖ל
IAגאלStrong AEmphatic — "surely redeem"; Leviticus legal formula; Qamets + Holem

Part C — Discrimination: IA, IC, Imperative, Imperfect, or Perfect

Identify each form correctly. Note any context clues given.

#FormContextIdentificationRootNotes
15מ֥וֹתpreceded by לָ
ICמותThe preposition לָ before this form = IC, not IA; "to die"
16מ֥וֹתfollowed by תָּמוּת
IAמותSame form, different context: no preposition, paired with Imperfect of same root = emphatic IA
17שָׁמ֣וֹרno context
IAשמרQamets under R1 is the key: IA always has Qamets; IC/Imper. have Shewa (שְׁמֹר)
18שְׁמֹרno context
IC or Imperative 2msשמרShewa under R1 = IC or Imper.; ambiguous without context
19שָׁמַ֣רno context
Perfect 3msשמרQamets + Pathach = Perfect 3ms; IA would have Holem-waw on R2 (שָׁמ֣וֹר)
20יִשְׁמֹ֣רno context
Imperfect 3msשמריִ– prefix = Imperfect; cannot be IA (which has no prefix)
21זָכ֕וֹרimperatival context (Exo 20:8)
Imperatival IAזכרQamets + Holem-waw; no paired finite verb; IA functions as command (Exo 20:8)
22לִ/זְכֹרpreceded by כִּי
ICזכרלִ prefix = IC; Shewa under ז = Strong A IC; "in order to remember"
23לֶ/כֶתno context
ICהלךI-י contracted IC (Seghol-taw); IA of הלך would be הָל֣וֹךְ (Qamets + Holem-waw)
24הָל֣וֹךְfollowed by וָ/שׁ֑וֹב
IA (Manner)הלךPaired IAs (hālôk wāšôb) = "going and returning" — manner/progressive (Gen 8:3)
25הָלַ֥ךְno context
Perfect 3msהלךQamets + Pathach = Perfect 3ms; IA is הָל֣וֹךְ (Holem-waw, not Pathach final)