NOT Hiphil — Qal: you shall make (covenant); plain Qal imperfect; no הִ prefix
Bonus — Genesis 6:1, 6:10
6:1
כִּֽי־הֵחֵ֣ל הָאָדָ֔ם לָרֹ֖ב
"When man began to multiply…"
6:10
וַיּ֥וֹלֶד נֹ֖חַ שְׁלֹשָׁ֣ה בָנִ֑ים
"And Noah fathered three sons."
#
Verb
Hiphil?
Conjugation
PGN
Root
Stem / Function
B1
הֵחֵל
✓
הֵחֵל
Yes
Perfect (qatal)
3ms
חָלַל
Causative — began (Hiphil of חָלַל = "to begin"; idiomatic)
B2
וַיּוֹלֶד
✓
וַיּוֹלֶד
Yes
Wayyiqtol
3ms
יָלַד
Causative — fathered / begat
Answer-key notes:
• #2 הִשְׁחִית and B1 הֵחֵל are Perfect (qatal), not Weqatal — both follow כִּי with no waw prefix.
• #1 נִשְׁחָתָה is Niphal (passive); #2 הִשְׁחִית is Hiphil (active causative) — same root שָׁחַת, different stems in the same verse.
• #16–17 and #20–21 illustrate the emphatic inf. absolute + imperfect construction: the inf. absolute intensifies the following finite verb ("shall certainly strike").
Wayyiqtol dominates in Gen 6–8 but is absent from Passages D and E. What does this tell you about how genre — narrative vs. divine oracle (Gen 22) vs. legal instruction (Deut 7) — shapes conjugation choice in the Hiphil?
Both Passage D (Gen 22:17) and Passage E (Deut 7:2) use the emphatic inf. absolute + imperfect pattern. What does the inf. absolute add beyond a plain imperfect? Are the two contexts — promise and command — using the emphasis for the same rhetorical purpose?
In Gen 6–8, God is the subject of nearly every Hiphil; Noah appears as subject only at #12 and #14. What does this distribution of agency tell you about the theological architecture of the flood narrative?