Ch28 Hophal Paradigm Drill

Stem: Hophal | Root שׁלך throughout (+ מות for Inf. Abs.)

For each row, the root and PGN are given. Select the correct Hophal form from the dropdown. Options include forms from Qal, Niphal, Hiphil, and Hophal across various person–gender–number combinations — choose the Hophal form for the PGN shown.

Key markers: Strong roots show Qibbuts (ֻ) under the prefix in Perfect and Imperfect; the Participle prefix is מֻ. The Imperative (Part F) uses theoretical paradigmatic forms; the Hophal Imperative is extremely rare in the OT (only one form clearly attested: הָפְנוּ, Jer 49:8, from root פנה).
Ref column: shows OT references where the specific Hophal form appears. "—" means not clearly attested for this root in this PGN. Where the MT shows Qamets Hatuf (ׇ) in place of Qibbuts (ֻ) in the prefix syllable — expected in open pretonic syllables — the ref is marked with *.

Part A — Perfect (9 forms) — Root שׁלך

#	Root	PGN	Ref	Form
1	שׁלך	3ms	—
✓		3ms		הֻשְׁלַךְ
2	שׁלך	3fs	Ezk 19:12
✓		3fs		הֻשְׁלְכָה
3	שׁלך	2ms	Isa 14:19 *
✓		2ms		הֻשְׁלַכְתָּ
4	שׁלך	2fs	—
✓		2fs		הֻשְׁלַכְתְּ
5	שׁלך	1cs	Psa 22:10 *
✓		1cs		הֻשְׁלַכְתִּי
6	שׁלך	3cp	—
✓		3cp		הֻשְׁלְכוּ
7	שׁלך	2mp	—
✓		2mp		הֻשְׁלַכְתֶּם
8	שׁלך	2fp	—
✓		2fp		הֻשְׁלַכְתֶּן
9	שׁלך	1cp	—
✓		1cp		הֻשְׁלַכְנוּ

Part B — Imperfect (10 forms) — Root שׁלך

#	Root	PGN	Ref	Form
1	שׁלך	3ms	—
✓		3ms		יֻשְׁלַךְ
2	שׁלך	3fs	—
✓		3fs		תֻּשְׁלַךְ
3	שׁלך	2ms (= 3fs)	—
✓		2ms		תֻּשְׁלַךְ
4	שׁלך	2fs	—
✓		2fs		תֻּשְׁלְכִי
5	שׁלך	1cs	—
✓		1cs		אֻשְׁלַךְ
6	שׁלך	3mp	Isa 34:3
✓		3mp		יֻשְׁלְכוּ
7	שׁלך	3fp	—
✓		3fp		תֻּשְׁלַכְנָה
8	שׁלך	2mp	—
✓		2mp		תֻּשְׁלְכוּ
9	שׁלך	2fp (= 3fp)	—
✓		2fp		תֻּשְׁלַכְנָה
10	שׁלך	1cp	—
✓		1cp		נֻשְׁלַךְ

Part C — Infinitive Construct (2 forms) — Root שׁלך

#	Root	Description	Ref	Form
1	שׁלך	Base	—
✓		Base		הֻשְׁלַךְ
2	שׁלך	with לְ	—
✓		with לְ		לְהֻשְׁלַךְ

Part D — Infinitive Absolute (1 form) — Root מות

The Hophal Infinitive Absolute is extremely rare; no form of מות Hophal Inf. Abs. is clearly attested in the MT. The form הוּמֵת represents the expected paradigmatic pattern. The root מות does appear abundantly in other Hophal conjugations (64 forms, e.g., יוּמַת, "he shall be put to death").

#	Root	Description	Ref	Form
1	מות	Inf. Absolute	—
✓		Inf. Absolute		הוּמֵת

Part E — Participle (4 forms) — Root שׁלך

#	Root	PGN	Ref	Form
1	שׁלך	ms	2Sa 20:21
✓		ms		מֻשְׁלָךְ
2	שׁלך	fs	1Ki 13:24
✓		fs		מֻשְׁלֶכֶת
3	שׁלך	mp	Jer 14:16
✓		mp		מֻשְׁלָכִים
4	שׁלך	fp	—
✓		fp		מֻשְׁלָכוֹת

Part F — Imperative (2 forms) — Root שׁלך

The Hophal Imperative is extremely rare in the OT. The only clearly attested form in the MT is הָפְנוּ (Jer 49:8), a 2mp from root פנה (III-he). The forms below represent the theoretical paradigmatic pattern for a strong root. Note that the 2ms form is identical in appearance to the Hophal Perfect 3ms and Hophal Infinitive Construct.

#	Root	PGN	Ref	Form
1	שׁלך	2ms	—
✓		2ms		הֻשְׁלַךְ
2	שׁלך	2mp	—
✓		2mp		הֻשְׁלְכוּ