Stem: Hophal (הֻפְעַל) — passive of the Hiphil causative | Passages: Gen 22:20 · Gen 39:1 · Gen 42:28 · Gen 43:18 · Exo 5:14–16 · Exo 10:8 · Exo 40:17–18 · Num 35:16–18, 30–31
Instructions: For each numbered verb, fill in: (1) Hophal? Yes/No (2) Conjugation (3) PGN (4) Root (5) Gloss. Click ▶ Answer to reveal the parse and the KJV translation.
Passage A — Genesis 22:20
Context: Following the account of Abraham's offering of Isaac on Mount Moriah (Genesis 22), news arrives from Mesopotamia.
KJV (Gen 22:20): "And it came to pass after these things, that it was told Abraham, saying, Behold, Milcah, she hath also born children unto thy brother Nahor."
Passage B — Exodus 5:14–16
Context: Pharaoh's taskmasters beat the Israelite foremen for failing to meet brick-making quotas.
KJV (Exo 5:14): "And the officers of the children of Israel, which Pharaoh's taskmasters had set over them, were beaten…"
Parsing challenge — Passage B: Verb 3 (נִתָּן) is a Niphal Participle, not a Hophal. Both are passive. The נ prefix (vs. מֻ) distinguishes Niphal from Hophal. Verb 4 (מֻכִּים) is the Hophal — the מֻ prefix + Qibbuts marks it as Hophal Participle.
KJV (Exo 5:16): "There is no straw given unto thy servants…"
4
מֻכִּים
✓
מֻכִּים
Yes
Participle
mp
נכה
being beaten (Hophal)
KJV (Exo 5:16): "…and, behold, thy servants are beaten…"
Passage C — Numbers 35:16–18, 30–31
Context: Torah legislation on murder and the death penalty.
Key form to watch: The formula מוֹתיוּמַת appears 4× in this passage. יוּמַת (Hophal Imperfect) is always Hophal. יָמוּת (Qal Imperfect) appears in the conditional clauses. The prefix vowel distinguishes them: יָ (Qal Pathach) vs. יוּ (Hophal Shureq).
KJV (Gen 43:18): "And the men were afraid, because they were brought into Joseph's house…"
Reflection Questions
Verbs 5, 7, 9, 11 all use the formula מוֹתיוּמַת. What two verb forms make up this formula? One is the Qal Infinitive Absolute (מוֹת) and one is the Hophal Imperfect (יוּמַת). What intensifying effect does the cognate absolute construction produce, and why does the law use the Hophal rather than the Qal יָמוּת?
In Passage B, verbs 3 (נִתָּן, Niphal) and 4 (מֻכִּים, Hophal) are both passive. What does the difference in stem tell you about the kind of passive? What Hiphil causative does the Hophal of נכה passivize?
Passage D (Gen 39:1) contains both a Hophal (הוּרַד, verb 12) and a Hiphil (הוֹרִדֻהוּ, verb 14) from the same root ירד. What is the difference in meaning between "Joseph was brought down" (Hophal) and "the Ishmaelites had brought him down" (Hiphil), and why does the narrator use both in the same verse?
Passage E (Exo 40:17–18) also uses both stems of קום — הוּקַם (Hophal, verb 15) and וַיָּקֶם (Hiphil, verb 16). What grammatical feature distinguishes them? (Hint: prefix vowel and root behavior in biconsonantal roots.)