קִבּוּץ or שׁוּרֶק prefix; R3 is א (quiesces silently); preceding vowel typically Qamets (ָ) or Tsere (ֵ)
Key distinction: I-yod/vav and Biconsonantal (hollow) roots both use שׁוּרֶק as their Hophal prefix vowel — unlike most other weak classes which retain קִבּוּץ. The reason: in both classes R1 is a quiescent consonant (yod/vav), so the vowel lengthens to compensate.
Part A — By Class
Group 1 — I-yod / I-vav
#
Form
Reference
Conjugation
PGN
Root
1
הוּרַד
Gen 39:1
1
הוּרַד
Gen 39:1
Perfect
3ms
יָרַד
— he was brought down; שׁוּרֶק prefix (הוּ) is the I-yod/vav Hophal marker; R1 yod has quiesced
2
יוּרַד
Gen 44:29
2
יוּרַד
Gen 44:29
Imperfect
3ms
יָרַד
— he will be brought down; שׁוּרֶק under imperfect prefix consonant (יוּ) — I-yod/vav pattern
3
הוּבָא
Lev 4:4
3
הוּבָא
Lev 4:4
Perfect
3ms
בּוֹא
— it was brought; הוּ prefix; root בּוֹא is I-vav (hollow); III-aleph: silent final א
4
הוּבְאוּ
Gen 43:18
4
הוּבְאוּ
Gen 43:18
Perfect
3cp
בּוֹא
— they were brought; הוּ prefix + וּ plural ending; I-vav root
5
מוּבָאִים
Gen 43:18
5
מוּבָאִים
Gen 43:18
Participle
mp
בּוֹא
— being brought; מוּ prefix (שׁוּרֶק under מ) is the I-yod/vav Hophal participle marker; ים plural
Group 2 — Biconsonantal (Hollow)
#
Form
Reference
Conjugation
PGN
Root
6
הוּקַם
Exo 40:17
6
הוּקַם
Exo 40:17
Perfect
3ms
קוּם
— it was set up/erected; הוּ prefix; hollow biconsonantal root (medial וּ vowel letter)
7
יוּמַת
Gen 26:11
7
יוּמַת
Gen 26:11
Imperfect
3ms
מוּת
— he shall be put to death; יוּ prefix — biconsonantal Hophal imperfect; hollow root מוּת
8
הוּסַר
Lev 4:31
8
הוּסַר
Lev 4:31
Perfect
3ms
סוּר
— it was removed; הוּ prefix; hollow root סוּר; "the fat was removed"
9
הוּשַׁב
Gen 42:28
9
הוּשַׁב
Gen 42:28
Perfect
3ms
שׁוּב
— it was returned/restored; הוּ prefix; hollow root שׁוּב; "my silver was returned"
10
יּוּשַׂם
Gen 24:33
10
יּוּשַׂם
Gen 24:33
Wayyiqtol
3ms
שִׂים
— and food was set before him; יּוּ prefix (wayyiqtol) — dagesh in יּ + שׁוּרֶק; hollow/biconsonantal root שִׂים
Group 3 — I-nun
#
Form
Reference
Conjugation
PGN
Root
11
וַיֻּגַּד
Gen 22:20
11
וַיֻּגַּד
Gen 22:20
Wayyiqtol
3ms
נָגַד
— and it was told; וַיֻּ prefix (wayyiqtol) + קִבּוּץ + dagesh forte in R2 (ג) — נ has assimilated
12
יֻּגַּד
Gen 38:13
12
יֻּגַּד
Gen 38:13
Imperfect
3ms
נָגַד
— it was told to Tamar; קִבּוּץ under prefix (יֻּ) + dagesh in R2 (ג) — I-nun assimilation
13
יֻּכּוּ
Exo 5:14
13
יֻּכּוּ
Exo 5:14
Wayyiqtol
3mp
נָכָה
— and they were beaten; קִבּוּץ + dagesh in R2 (כּ) — I-nun; III-he root; וּ plural ending; "the taskmasters beat the Israelite foremen"
14
יֻּתַּן
Lev 11:38
14
יֻּתַּן
Lev 11:38
Imperfect
3ms
נָתַן
— if water is put on the seed; קִבּוּץ prefix + dagesh in R2 (תּ) — I-nun; the second נ of נָתַן also assimilates, causing extra dagesh in R3
15
יֻּקַּם
Gen 4:15
15
יֻּקַּם
Gen 4:15
Imperfect
3ms
נָקַם
— he will be avenged; קִבּוּץ + dagesh in R2 (קּ) — I-nun: נ of נָקַם has assimilated; "Cain will be avenged sevenfold"
Group 4 — III-he
#
Form
Reference
Conjugation
PGN
Root
16
הֻגְלָה
Amos 1:5
16
הֻגְלָה
Amos 1:5
Perfect
3ms
גָּלָה
— the people of Aram were exiled; קִבּוּץ under הֻ + III-he: Qamets-he ending
17
הֻגְלוּ
Jer 29:1
17
הֻגְלוּ
Jer 29:1
Perfect
3cp
גָּלָה
— those who were exiled from Jerusalem; קִבּוּץ under הֻ + וּ plural (III-he 3cp Qatal pattern: ה→ וּ)
18
מוּכָּה
Deut 28:27
18
מוּכָּה
Deut 28:27
Participle
fs
נָכָה
— stricken (with); מוּ prefix (I-yod/nun in participle); dagesh in R2 (כּ) — I-nun; III-he: ה ending on feminine participle
19
יֻּכֶּה
Exo 21:20
19
יֻּכֶּה
Exo 21:20
Imperfect
3ms
נָכָה
— if he is struck/beaten; קִבּוּץ prefix + dagesh in R2 (כּ) — I-nun; III-he: Seghol-he ending in imperfect
20
הֻלַּד
Exo 1:22
20
הֻלַּד
Exo 1:22
Perfect
3ms
יָלַד
— every son who is born; קִבּוּץ under הֻ + dagesh in R2 (לּ); root יָלַד is I-yod; the dagesh assimilates the yod's behavior in Hophal
Group 5 — I-guttural
#
Form
Reference
Conjugation
PGN
Root
21
הוּחַל
Gen 4:26
21
הוּחַל
Gen 4:26
Perfect
3ms
חָלַל
— it was begun/profaned; הוּ prefix; guttural ח: no dagesh, takes full vowel (Pathach under ח); "then it was begun to call on the name of YHWH"
22
יָחֳרַם
Ezr 10:8
22
יָחֳרַם
Ezr 10:8
Imperfect
3ms
חָרַם
— his property will be forfeited/devoted; I-guttural: hateph-Qamets under ח (יָ + חֳ); "all his property will be devoted to destruction"
23
הֻחְלָה
1 Sam 21:6
23
הֻחְלָה
1 Sam 21:6
Perfect
3fs
חָלָה
— it had been set apart/consecrated; קִבּוּץ under הֻ + Shewa under guttural ח + III-he ה ending (fs suffix)
24
הֻאֲמַן
2 Chr 9:8
24
הֻאֲמַן
2 Chr 9:8
Perfect
3ms
אָמַן
— he was found faithful/established; קִבּוּץ under הֻ + Hateph Pathach under guttural א — I-aleph (I-guttural); "because your God has set you…on his throne"
25
יֶֽחֱטָא
Num 15:28
25
יֶֽחֱטָא
Num 15:28
Imperfect
3ms
חָטָא
— he will be cleansed/pardoned; I-guttural: hateph-Seghol under ח; III-aleph: silent final א; "the priest shall make atonement and he will be forgiven"
Group 6 — Geminate
#
Form
Reference
Conjugation
PGN
Root
26
הוּסַב
2 Sam 3:12
26
הוּסַב
2 Sam 3:12
Perfect
3ms
סָבַב
— the kingdom was turned over; הוּ prefix; geminate root ס-ב-ב (R2=R3); שׁוּרֶק form of Hophal geminate
27
מוּסַבּוֹת
Num 32:38
27
מוּסַבּוֹת
Num 32:38
Participle
fp
סָבַב
— their names having been changed/surrounded; מוּ prefix + dagesh forte in R3 (בּ) — geminate contraction; feminine plural וֹת ending
28
הֻסַּב
1 Kgs 2:15
28
הֻסַּב
1 Kgs 2:15
Perfect
3ms
סָבַב
— the kingdom was turned over; קִבּוּץ under הֻ + dagesh forte in R2 (סּ) — alternate geminate Hophal form; contrast הוּסַב (item 26) which uses שׁוּרֶק
29
יֻּתַּם
2 Sam 20:18
29
יֻּתַּם
2 Sam 20:18
Imperfect
3ms
תָּמַם
— a matter will be completed/finished; קִבּוּץ + dagesh in R2 (תּ) — geminate root ת-מ-מ (R2=R3)
30
יֻּכַּל
Num 13:30
30
יֻּכַּל
Num 13:30
Imperfect
3ms
כָּלַל
— it will be completed/able to be done; קִבּוּץ + dagesh in R2 (כּ) — geminate root כ-ל-ל; "we are well able to overcome it"
Group 7 — III-ח/ע (Lamed-Guttural)
#
Form
Reference
Conjugation
PGN
Root
31
וַתֻּקַּח
Gen 12:15
31
וַתֻּקַּח
Gen 12:15
Wayyiqtol
3fs
לָקַח
— Sarai was taken; קִבּוּץ + dagesh in R2 (ק) — ל of לָקַח assimilates (like I-nun); R3 ח (lamed-guttural) refuses dagesh; Pathach under ח (compensatory lengthening)
32
יֻקַּח
Job 28:2
32
יֻקַּח
Job 28:2
Imperfect
3ms
לָקַח
— iron is taken from the earth; קִבּוּץ prefix + dagesh in R2 (ק) from ל-assimilation; R3 ח cannot take dagesh; Pathach under final ח is the III-ח/ע diagnostic
33
הֻמְלַחַתְּ
Ezk 16:4
33
הֻמְלַחַתְּ
Ezk 16:4
Perfect
2fs
מָלַח
— you were not salted at birth; קִבּוּץ under הֻ; mobile Shewa under מ (R1); R3 ח (lamed-guttural) takes Pathach furtive — cannot receive dagesh; 2fs suffix תּ
34
יֻשְׁלַח
(paradigmatic)
34
יֻשְׁלַח
(paradigmatic)
Imperfect
3ms
שָׁלַח
— he will be sent (paradigmatic); קִבּוּץ prefix + Shewa under שׁ (R1); R3 ח guttural refuses dagesh — Pathach under final ח; contrast strong יֻקְטַל
35
מֻשְׁלַחַת
(paradigmatic)
35
מֻשְׁלַחַת
(paradigmatic)
Participle
fs
שָׁלַח
— she who is dismissed / sent away (paradigmatic); מֻ prefix (Hophal Ptc marker); R3 ח guttural: Pathach under ח + Pathach furtive before ח + ת suffix — compare strong מֻקְטֶלֶת
Group 8 — III-א (Lamed-Alef)
#
Form
Reference
Conjugation
PGN
Root
36
מוּצֵאת
Gen 38:25
36
מוּצֵאת
Gen 38:25
Participle
fs
יָצָא
— being brought out (Tamar); מוּ prefix (שׁוּרֶק) = Hophal Ptc from I-yod root יָצָא; R3 א (III-aleph) quiesces silently after Tsere (ֵ); feminine ת suffix
37
הוּצָאָה
Ezk 38:8
37
הוּצָאָה
Ezk 38:8
Perfect
3fs
יָצָא
— it was brought forth; הוּ prefix (שׁוּרֶק) — I-yod root יָצָא; R3 א quiesces after Qamets (ָ); feminine 3fs suffix ָה
38
מוּצָאוֹת
Jer 38:22
38
מוּצָאוֹת
Jer 38:22
Participle
fp
יָצָא
— the women being brought out; מוּ prefix (Hophal Ptc); R3 א quiesces after Qamets (ָ); feminine plural וֹת ending; I-yod root יָצָא (שׁוּרֶק in prefix)
39
הֻמְצָא
(paradigmatic)
39
הֻמְצָא
(paradigmatic)
Perfect
3ms
מָצָא
— it was found (paradigmatic); קִבּוּץ under הֻ; Shewa under מ (R1); R3 א (III-aleph) quiesces silently after Qamets (ָ); contrast attested יָצָא forms above
40
יֻמְצָא
(paradigmatic)
40
יֻמְצָא
(paradigmatic)
Imperfect
3ms
מָצָא
— it will be found (paradigmatic); קִבּוּץ prefix (יֻ); Shewa under מ (R1); final א quiesces after Qamets — the only visible III-aleph diagnostic is the Qamets (ָ) before א
Part B — Mixed
Identify the weak class first, then parse fully.
#
Form
Reference
Weak class
Conjugation
PGN
Root
41
הוּבָא
Gen 33:11
41
הוּבָא
Gen 33:11
I-vav / Biconsonantal
Perfect
3ms
בּוֹא
— the gift was brought to him; הוּ prefix; root בּוֹא is I-vav and hollow
42
יֻּגַּד
Gen 48:2
42
יֻּגַּד
Gen 48:2
I-nun
Imperfect
3ms
נָגַד
— it was told to Jacob; קִבּוּץ + dagesh in R2 (ג) — נ of נָגַד has assimilated
43
יוּמַת
Lev 20:2
43
יוּמַת
Lev 20:2
Biconsonantal
Imperfect
3ms
מוּת
— he shall be put to death; יוּ prefix — hollow biconsonantal Hophal imperfect
44
הֻגְלוּ
2 Kgs 17:23
44
הֻגְלוּ
2 Kgs 17:23
III-he
Perfect
3cp
גָּלָה
— Israel was exiled from its land; קִבּוּץ under הֻ + וּ plural ending (III-he 3cp: ה drops, וּ takes its place)
45
הוּקַם
Num 7:1
45
הוּקַם
Num 7:1
Biconsonantal
Perfect
3ms
קוּם
— the tabernacle was erected; הוּ prefix; hollow root קוּם; medial vav vowel letter is the biconsonantal marker
46
הוּסַר
Lev 6:4
46
הוּסַר
Lev 6:4
Biconsonantal
Perfect
3ms
סוּר
— the ashes shall be removed; הוּ prefix; hollow root סוּר; distinguish from Geminate: no R2=R3
47
יֻּכּוּ
Num 14:12
47
יֻּכּוּ
Num 14:12
I-nun + III-he
Wayyiqtol
3mp
נָכָה
— and they were struck; קִבּוּץ + dagesh in R2 (כּ) — I-nun; III-he root; וּ plural; note both weak classes interact
48
הוּרַד
1 Sam 30:24
48
הוּרַד
1 Sam 30:24
I-yod
Perfect
3ms
יָרַד
— the share of the one who stayed with the baggage; הוּ prefix; R1 yod has quiesced; "so his share shall be equal"
49
הוּחַל
Gen 4:26
49
הוּחַל
Gen 4:26
I-guttural
Perfect
3ms
חָלַל
— it was begun; הוּ prefix; guttural ח: no dagesh, full vowel (Pathach) replaces Shewa under R1
50
הוּסַב
Josh 15:3
50
הוּסַב
Josh 15:3
Geminate
Perfect
3ms
סָבַב
— it turned/went around; הוּ prefix; root ס-ב-ב has R2=R3 (geminate) — this is the only reliable distinguisher from biconsonantal הוּסַר (root סוּר: hollow, not geminate)
51
תּוּרַד
Isa 14:15
51
תּוּרַד
Isa 14:15
I-yod / I-vav
Imperfect
2ms
יָרַד
— you will be brought down to Sheol; תּוּ prefix = 2ms Hophal Impf; שׁוּרֶק marks I-yod/vav class; R1 yod has quiesced
52
הוּמְתוּ
2 Sam 21:9
52
הוּמְתוּ
2 Sam 21:9
Biconsonantal
Perfect
3cp
מוּת
— they were put to death; הוּ prefix (Biconsonantal Hophal Pf) + 3cp ending וּ; contrast 3ms יוּמַת (item 7)
53
הֻגַּדְתִּי
(paradigmatic)
53
הֻגַּדְתִּי
(paradigmatic)
I-nun
Perfect
1cs
נָגַד
— I was told; קִבּוּץ under הֻ + dagesh forte in R2 (גּ) from I-nun assimilation + 1cs suffix תִּי
54
הֻגְלֵיתֶם
(paradigmatic)
54
הֻגְלֵיתֶם
(paradigmatic)
III-he
Perfect
2mp
גָּלָה
— you (pl.) were exiled; קִבּוּץ under הֻ + III-he: Tsere-yod pattern before 2mp suffix תֶם; compare 3cp הֻגְלוּ (item 17/34)
55
הוּרַדְנוּ
(paradigmatic)
55
הוּרַדְנוּ
(paradigmatic)
I-yod / I-vav
Perfect
1cp
יָרַד
— we were brought down; הוּ prefix (I-yod Hophal Pf) + 1cp suffix נוּ; R1 yod has quiesced
Discussion Questions
The I-yod/vav Hophal (e.g., הוּרַד, הוּבָא) and the Biconsonantal (hollow) Hophal (e.g., הוּקַם, הוּסַר) both use שׁוּרֶק as the prefix vowel. What phonological principle explains why both classes abandon the usual קִבּוּץ prefix of the strong Hophal? What happens to R1 in each class?
Compare וַיֻּגַּד (I-nun Hophal wayyiqtol, item 11) and יֻּכּוּ (I-nun Hophal, item 13). Both have dagesh forte in R2. What caused that dagesh? What happened to the נ of each root? Does anything else unusual happen to יֻּכּוּ beyond the I-nun assimilation?
Items 16–17 (הֻגְלָה / הֻגְלוּ) and items 18–19 (מוּכָּה / יֻּכֶּה) all come from III-he roots. How does the III-he ending manifest in the Hophal perfect 3ms vs. 3cp? How does it appear in the participle vs. imperfect?
Items 26 and 28 (הוּסַב and הֻסַּב) are both Hophal forms of the same geminate root סָבַב but have different prefix vowels. What accounts for this variation? How do you distinguish the Geminate Hophal from the Biconsonantal Hophal when both may display שׁוּרֶק?
Write out the Hophal paradigm for מוּת (Biconsonantal hollow): Perfect 3ms, Imperfect 3ms, Wayyiqtol 3ms, Participle ms. For each form, identify the prefix vowel and explain how it differs from the strong Hophal (הֻקְטַל pattern).