BBH Chapter 31 · Piel Weak Verbs
For each weak verb form, identify the Root, Stem, Conjugation, and PGN. Type the root in Hebrew. Use the dropdowns for Stem, Conjugation, and PGN. Click ▶ Answer to check.
| # | Hebrew Form | Root | Stem | Conjugation | PGN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | בֵּרַךְ | |||||
| ברך | Piel | Perfect | 3ms | I-guttural ב: virtual dagesh → Tsere (compensatory lengthening) before R2 ר; Hireq-Tsere vowels signal Piel perfect. | ||
| 2 | בָּרַךְ | |||||
| ברך | Qal | Perfect | 3ms | Qamets-Pathach = standard Qal perfect; no dagesh in R2 ר. Compare Piel #1 (בֵּרַךְ) which has Tsere under ב. | ||
| 3 | גִּלָּה | |||||
| גלה | Piel | Perfect | 3ms | Dagesh forte in ל (R2) + III-ה ending ָּה (Qamets + dagesh-he); Hireq under ג = Piel III-ה perfect. | ||
| 4 | גָּלָה | |||||
| גלה | Qal | Perfect | 3ms | No dagesh in ל; Qamets-Qamets-he (no dagesh before ה) = Qal III-ה perfect. Compare Piel #3 (גִּלָּה) which has dagesh in ל. | ||
| 5 | נִגְלָה | |||||
| גלה | Niphal | Perfect | 3ms | נִ prefix + Qamets under ל + III-ה ending = Niphal III-ה perfect. Passive/reflexive of Qal. | ||
| 6 | הִגְלָה | |||||
| גלה | Hiphil | Perfect | 3ms | הִ prefix + III-ה contraction: Qamets under ל (no Hireq-Yod; III-ה root contracts) = Hiphil III-ה perfect. Causative. | ||
| 7 | צִוָּה | |||||
| צוה | Piel | Perfect | 3ms | III-ה root (ו is R2); dagesh forte in וּ; Hireq under צ; ָּה ending = Piel III-ה perfect. SA: no common Qal for "to command." | ||
| 8 | חִזֵּק | |||||
| חזק | Piel | Perfect | 3ms | Guttural ח (R1) takes Hireq; dagesh forte in ז (R2, non-guttural); Tsere pattern = Piel perfect. I-guttural: no problem for R2 dagesh since R2 = ז. | ||
| 9 | חָזַק | |||||
| חזק | Qal | Perfect | 3ms | No dagesh in ז; Qamets-Pathach = Qal perfect. ח (R1) guttural takes Qamets. Compare Piel #8 (חִזֵּק) which has Hireq under ח and dagesh in ז. | ||
| 10 | יְבָרֵךְ | |||||
| ברך | Piel | Imperfect | 3ms | Shewa under יְ (Piel imperfect prefix) + compensatory Qamets under ב (virtual dagesh) + Tsere = Piel imperfect with I-guttural lengthening. | ||
| 11 | יְצַוֶּה | |||||
| צוה | Piel | Imperfect | 3ms | Shewa prefix + pathach under צ + dagesh in וּ (R2) + Tsere-He (ֶּה) ending = Piel imperfect of III-ה root. Full (non-apocopated) form. | ||
| 12 | יִגְלֶה | |||||
| גלה | Qal | Imperfect | 3ms | Hireq under יִ; no dagesh in ג; segol + III-ה he = Qal III-ה imperfect. Compare Piel #14 (יְגַלֶּה) which has Shewa prefix and dagesh in ל. | ||
| 13 | יִגָּלֶה | |||||
| גלה | Niphal | Imperfect | 3ms | Hireq prefix + dagesh forte in ג (assimilated נ of Niphal) + Qamets-segol-he = Niphal III-ה imperfect. | ||
| 14 | יְגַלֶּה | |||||
| גלה | Piel | Imperfect | 3ms | Shewa under יְ (Piel prefix); dagesh forte in ל (R2); Tsere-He (ֶּה) ending = Piel III-ה imperfect. Compare Qal #12 (יִגְלֶה). | ||
| 15 | יַגְלֶה | |||||
| גלה | Hiphil | Imperfect | 3ms | Pathach under יַ (Hiphil imperfect prefix pattern); no dagesh in ל; segol + III-ה he = Hiphil III-ה imperfect. Causative. | ||
| 16 | וַיְבָרֶךְ | |||||
| ברך | Piel | Wayyiqtol | 3ms | Waw + Shewa under יְ (no dagesh in י = Piel wayyiqtol) + compensatory Qamets + Seghol. Compare Qal wayyiqtol (וַיִּבָּרֶךְ) which has dagesh in י. | ||
| 17 | וַיְצַו | |||||
| צוה | Piel | Wayyiqtol | 3ms | Waw + Shewa + pathach + וּ; III-ה root: ה drops completely in wayyiqtol (apocopated). Full imperfect = יְצַוֶּה (#11). | ||
| 18 | וַיִּגֶּל | |||||
| גלה | Qal | Wayyiqtol | 3ms | Dagesh forte in יּ (wayyiqtol marker) + no dagesh in ג + ה apocopated = Qal wayyiqtol of III-ה. The lone Seghol under ג is the contracted form. | ||
| 19 | בָּרֵךְ | |||||
| ברך | Piel | Imperative | 2ms | Qamets + Tsere; no prefix; I-guttural ב: virtual dagesh (compensatory lengthening) before R2. Piel imperative pattern: a-class + Tsere. | ||
| 20 | גַּל | |||||
| גלה | Qal | Imperative | 2ms | Apocopated form: III-ה ה drops in Qal imperative 2ms; Pathach under ג + ל = Qal imperative of III-ה. Compare Piel #21 (גַּלֵּה) which retains ה with dagesh. | ||
| 21 | גַּלֵּה | |||||
| גלה | Piel | Imperative | 2ms | Pathach + dagesh forte in ל (R2) + Tsere + he = Piel imperative of III-ה. Compare Qal #20 (גַּל) which is apocopated. | ||
| 22 | מְבָרֵךְ | |||||
| ברך | Piel | Participle | ms | מְ prefix (Piel Ptc) + compensatory Qamets under ב (I-guttural virtual dagesh) + Tsere = Piel participle of I-guttural root. | ||
| 23 | מְגַלֶּה | |||||
| גלה | Piel | Participle | ms | מְ prefix + pathach + dagesh forte in ל (R2) + Seghol + he = Piel participle of III-ה. Compare Qal #24 (גֹּלֶה): no מְ, Holem under ג. | ||
| 24 | גֹּלֶה | |||||
| גלה | Qal | Participle | ms | Holem under ג; no מְ prefix; Seghol + he = Qal active participle of III-ה. Compare Piel #23 (מְגַלֶּה) which has מְ prefix and dagesh in ל. | ||
| 25 | הֻגְלָה | |||||
| גלה | Hophal | Perfect | 3ms | הֻ prefix (u-class Qibbuts = Hophal passive marker) + III-ה ending (Qamets-he) = Hophal III-ה perfect. Passive of Hiphil: "was exiled/uncovered." Compare Hiphil #6 (הִגְלָה). |